You scrutinise every campaign. When did you last scrutinise where it lands?

Every campaign gets scrutinised. The brief gets argued over, the creative gets tested, the media plan gets optimised week to week, and once it launches, someone is watching the numbers from day one. Then it lands somewhere, a website, a landing page, a booking journey. That part, the part everything else depends on, often hasn't been properly looked at in months.

"We'll spend weeks perfecting a campaign that then drives people to a page nobody's checked since it went live. The campaign gets all the attention because it has a deadline. The website doesn't have a deadline. It just sits there, quietly getting older," says Dan Jenkins, Head of Client Services at Platform 195.

Why the destination gets neglected

At the largest travel retailers, this gets caught. There's often an entire team whose entire job is booking-flow friction, and a content team whose entire job is keeping pages current.

At a smaller or mid-size OTA or tour operator, that function usually doesn't exist as a dedicated role. It's absorbed into whoever's free, and it's the first thing that drops off the list when a campaign deadline is bearing down, not because anyone decided it mattered less, but because a campaign has a launch date and a stakeholder watching it, and a landing page, once built, has neither.

What that gap actually costs

If a brilliant campaign sends people into a booking journey with unnecessary friction, you're paying to expose more people to that friction. And you're paying the CPC every time.

The problems are rarely dramatic. Think of an extra confirmation screen left behind after a promotion ended, still sitting in the booking journey eighteen months later. Nobody deliberately decides to keep it there, it survives because nobody is looking.

Or a destination guide attracting valuable organic traffic but still citing prices and opening times from two seasons ago, because it did its job once and nobody's been back to it since. Neither failure announces itself but both quietly erode the value of every campaign that sends people toward them.

Why it matters more than it used to

These two problems cost you in different ways. A booking journey with friction has always been expensive, every extra step is paid traffic you've already bought, wasted before it converts.

Content is the newer front. Google's May 2026 guidance on AI search puts renewed emphasis on unique, non-commodity content: material grounded in genuine experience, expertise and a point of view, rather than information available everywhere else. This is part of a broader shift in how travel brands need to think about discovery and visibility.

Ahrefs' own research adds weight to that. Content cited in AI answers runs 25.7% fresher on average than pages that merely rank well in classic search. That makes freshness and distinctiveness increasingly difficult for marketing teams to treat as housekeeping.

"Keeping content fresh doesn't mean rewriting everything every quarter. It means knowing which pages are doing the heavy lifting and giving them a proper review on a schedule. AI speeds up the drafting, but someone who knows the destination still has to decide what's changed, what's true and what's worth saying that nobody else is saying," says Dan.

Three questions worth asking on Monday morning

1. When was your highest-value customer journey last tested end to end by someone who didn't build it?

2. When were your highest-traffic evergreen pages last properly reviewed, not just glanced at?

3. And who owns those two things, and when is their next review?

Run that check honestly, and you'll know something worth knowing before spending another quarter's media budget finding out the hard way: whether you're about to send another wave of paid traffic into a journey nobody's actually looked at.

If all it does is raise more questions than answers, it might be a good time to contact Platform 195.

‍